Posts

Showing posts from July, 2013

Homosexuality and....Abortion????

The conflation or supposed correspondence of homosexuality and abortion is ridiculous to say the least. Gay people aren’t the ones having abortions or the reason for them; it’s like blaming gay people for a divorce of a straight couple without mentioning the fact that fiscal matters, adultery, and irreconcilable differences are the issues behind divorce. In fact I have a video, I’ll annotate it here and show you a video I did where NOM actually takes steps to “protect marriage” But this whole conflation of homosexuality and abortion, pedophilia, breakdown of family doesn’t address anything like the income inequality that brings forth crime, the fact that people are out there starving and don’t see the value in education. It is easy to blame gays or other people which is the simple thing instead of looking at the tough things they’ll have to address before the situation can make progress But again to homosexuality and abortion, after the apparent suicide of Jamie Rodemeyer, I was

B37..There She Goes Again

After the trial and acquittal of George Zimmerman, there was a juror that has made splashes in the media. She is only known as B37 and her jury selection video is here:   ( http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/07/zimmerman_trial_juror_b37_why_did_prosecutors_let_her_on_the_trayvon_martin.html ) There is also now talk of unsupervised visits that she had with family and that could sway her decision by a simple comment. Another thing that makes me leery of her is that she said that even though the Stand Your Ground Law wasn’t given as a defense, they still considered simply: did Zimmerman feel as if his life were in danger? She also said that his history of reporting black men to the police wasn’t looked at in the deliberations and further, she denied that race was even a part of it though George is recorded saying: Those fucking punks they always get away. She also said that Martin was responsible for   his own death and that Zimmerman should continue as

Background Checks on All Guns NOW!!!!

http://occupydemocrats.com/houston-police-officer-shot-and-killed-with-assault-rifle-by-gun-dealing-child-molester/ God, Gays and Guns, that’s the conservative slogan that I as a liberal often use to describe the 3 talking points of Teaturds who feel that everything from health policy to the justice system should be dictacted to the Bible. But when we talk about the trifecta, we have uncovered a lot that is off kilter, which is a respectful way of saying “they’re nuts” Remember after the Newtown shooting how many gun groups came on TV telling us of responsible gun owners and how we shouldn’t penalize them because criminals will get a hold of guns no matter what? That they opposed background checks on any gun owner for that very reason. Well, I return to TX once again after doing a video about Wendy Davis to talk about why we need background checks—which aren’t recorded by the way. We need background checks for according to NC, food stamps, childcare work, employment, so why

Does Ken Mehlman Deserve A Second Chance?

The video companion is here: http://youtu.be/1V7sFXar4Ts Remember these guys: Ed Schrock and his voice personal ad? Larry Craig and his wide stance? Ted Haggard’s meth and man ass? George Alan Rekers and his rentboy scandal? What about that Puerto Rican Senator Roberto Arango who was “documenting his weight loss” (I personally wonder what his naked exposed butt hole has to do with weight loss, I guess it could take a cannon and now it could hardly take a cucumber). This was exposed to the media after pushing a constitutional amendment banning marriage? A local example: Craigslist Chris Lee who was looking for trans women to have sex with. Then there’s Ken Mehlman…a man who basically was successful in getting 11 states to put bans in their constitutions, and when you really think about it, this was only the start of the backlash that would begin after Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court said that a statute was unconstitutional that prohibited gay couples from marrying. In a 4-3 de

Condoms in Prisons?

The full article can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2013/07/07/us/ap-us-california-prisons-condoms.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0#h[TASBih,2,AiiPho,TCsBtc,2 ] SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California prisoners have unprotected sexual contact, forced or consensual, even if both are illegal, and this reality often leads to the spread of HIV and other diseases in prisons and in communities where felons are paroled. One state lawmaker says it's time to give inmates a way to practice safe sex behind bars to reduce an infection rate that experts say is much higher than that of the general population. The bill, AB999, passed the Assembly and is awaiting consideration in the state Senate. If it becomes law, California would be the second state behind Vermont, which has a fraction of the inmate population, to provide condoms to all prisoners. Canada, most of the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa already take that step, according to legislative rese