Real Newsblast Episode 8 Cases and Propaganda
PULSE Case People v Noor Salman
After the June 2016 attack on Pulse nightclub, people clamored
for action, but I don’t think the action people wanted was to go after Omar
Mateen’s wife, Noor Salman
To the case: Judge Byron, who presided over the case asked a few
questions of FBI Special Agent Richard Fennern, and it revealed exactly what
many marginalized people have faced: that the FBI knew that Salman is innocent
of the charges but decided to bring them against her anyway. Judge Byron ended
up lashing out at the FBI committing fraud in order to advance this case. Let
it be known that it’s rare for a spouse to be prosecuted for a terrorist attack
carried out by their spouse, even when suspected
It goes on to say that Mateen regularly abused her, Salman has a
low IQ, was registered in Special Ed classes and is high on the suggestibility
index which makes her vulnerable to manipulation. There was also no real proof
of being sympathetic to the Islamic State nor any locational proof of the two
going down to Pulse before that night. Evidence DOES suggest that Mateen wasn’t
even looking for gay clubs, he just searched for nightclubs and Pulse showed up
as the first result. Also, Salman had every opportunity to flee the country but
never attempted to do so.
Ms. Salman was acquitted of all charges by a federal jury, which almost never happens when the defendant is Muslim
Ms. Salman was acquitted of all charges by a federal jury, which almost never happens when the defendant is Muslim
Photoshop
Emma Gonzales is one of the Parkland survivors who has been a
public figure in the aftermath of the shooting. They’ve gotten a lot of flak
from the so called pro-gun radicals who actually believe that it is egregious
to demand that children not be shot at while attending school. So, this picture
of Gonzales ripping up the Constitution went viral and stoked a lot of hatred because
we all know the 2nd Amendment is the only one that matters, not the
5th and Due Process, or the 10th with state rights or the
14th which talks about Equal Protection under the law, the 25th
which prescribes the process of filling a Presidential vacancy. Or the 22nd
that calls for Presidential term limits! Only the 2nd Amendment
matters to these people. It is in that service to the 2nd Amendment,
right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness is subject. That is bananas!
Bonkers! Silly! Crazy! Idiotic! If there were no 2nd Amendment they
wouldn’t care about the Constitution anyway.
I’ve also run across people who are treating every call for sane
gun regulation as if it’s an attack on their guns. Well, we have safety
regulations on many things to the government must be trying to take away cars,
rollercoasters, medicine, water and even food
If your whole thought process when a mass shooting happens is: What about Chicago? Gun control laws don’t work there, then you are a sorry excuse for a human being and trash is too polite of a complement for you
YT
Case
On March 26, a Judge (Lucy Koh) dismissed a lawsuit brought by Conservative
Personality Denis Prager that alleged that Youtube was silencing conservative
viewpoints. The Judge said that the Plaintiff did not support his case.
Dennis Prager blipped on my radar when I used to listen to
Christian radio a lot and later on when a Prager University video came up on
the Civil War. Later I found out that Prager University is a digital media
operation that advances conservative thought and not an actual University. The
lawsuit said that Youtube and Google had unfairly monetized and flagged their
videos and even placed it in the restrictive mode.
Now, something is fishy to me because I’ve seen a few Prager U videos and I have never seen anything objectionable other than just disagreeing with some of the views of the speaker. What I think is going on is two-fold: Using Russia as an excuse to silence independent media and advertisers not wanting to advertise on something controversial. I think those two taken together explain a lot of what’s going on as well as changing their algorithm to put “trusted” read corporate results first
Now, something is fishy to me because I’ve seen a few Prager U videos and I have never seen anything objectionable other than just disagreeing with some of the views of the speaker. What I think is going on is two-fold: Using Russia as an excuse to silence independent media and advertisers not wanting to advertise on something controversial. I think those two taken together explain a lot of what’s going on as well as changing their algorithm to put “trusted” read corporate results first
With that I will suggest these NewsTubers who are covering a lot
of news that I am interested in and if you want, you can support them on
Patreon I am sure they will appreciate it. YT has also been unsubscribing
people so click the bell so you can be alerted every time they upload a video.
Thank you for joining me for Real Newsblast, see you for Episode 9: The Scott
Blues
Comments
Post a Comment